Echeverry, D; Ibbs, C W and Kim, S (1991) Sequencing knowledge for construction scheduling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 117(1), pp. 118-130. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper describes and formalizes knowledge utilized by skilled schedulers for sequencing construction activities. Although it is recognized that construction scheduling involves many tasks (activity identification, duration estimation, etc.), the focus here is limited to an understanding of a number of key activity sequencing principles., This paper provides a grammar or language that represents governing factors for construction activity sequencing. Four basic factors are identified and described in detail. The physical relationships that exist among the different building components is one of the factors. Another is the interaction of construction trades. Sequencing is also affected by the requirement of an interference-free path for all the objects to be displaced around the job site at construction time. Code regulations are also relevant for determining the order of execution of certain activities. A discussion of the flexibility of these four different sequencing constraints and of their relation to time is also presented. Finally, a brief overview of a knowledge-based prototype system that incorporates a few of the identified sequencing governing factors is provided.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | regulation, estimation, construction scheduling, interaction, construction time, scheduler, construction activity, building component, prototype, duration |
| Subjects: | practitioner, project controls, construction operations, architectural elements, behavioral psychology, modelling and simulation, financial and cost management, political science |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Site Management, Research Practice, Design Practice, Governance, Time Control, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here