Fondahl, J W (1991) The development of the construction engineer: Past progress and future problems. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 117(3), pp. 380-392. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
A retrospective view briefly traces graduate-level educational efforts that have resulted in the emergence of the construction engineer as a recognized member of the civil engineering profession. Then, a prospective view identifies four problem areas that relate to construction activities and should be of concern to civil engineers. These include the need for more effective implementation of new techniques, a reduction of disputes and litigation, improved contractual relationships, and professional teamwork that provides better results for the client. An example based on project scheduling and resource leveling is presented to relate and illustrate these problem areas. The example indicates that after 30 years of application of a “new” technique, a widespread lack of full understanding still leads to improper implementation, that this can lead to extended litigation, that contractual relationships create adversarial relationships in which many civil engineers are losing control to protect their clients, and that due to lack of teamwork by civil engineers in different specialities, prevention or mitigation of damages for the benefit of the client and the public is not being achieved.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | emergence, contractual relationship, mitigation, damages, civil engineer, project scheduling, implementation, prevention, profession, engineer, construction activity, dispute, litigation, resource levelling, teamwork |
| Subjects: | management, financial risk, project controls, systems engineering, contractual relationship, profession, dispute resolution, institututions, resource management, contractual arrangements, construction operations |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Organizational Design, Site Management, Time Control, Contract Administration, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here