Jaselskis, E J and Ashley, D B (1991) Optimal allocation of project management resources for achieving success. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 117(2), pp. 321-340. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper discusses important aspects that can help project managers efficiently allocate their limited resources and thus help them achieve high levels of construction project performance. Additional, previously undiscussed model outcomes are presented that focus on the impact of the project team, planning, and control efforts as they relate to achieving “overall” project success, better-than-expected schedule performance, and better-than-expected budget performance. Results demonstrate that key success factors affect project outcomes differently. For example, increasing the number of budget updates has more of an impact on achieving better budget performance than it does on achieving better schedule and overall project performance. Implementation of a constructability program seems to have a significant impact on achieving overall project success and better schedule performance—especially on fixed-price contracts. Reducing team turnover has a more significant impact on improving budget performance than it does in achieving better schedule or overall project performance. A robustness analysis of the model outcomes is presented, along with a discussion on the study limitations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | project outcome, schedule performance, project performance, construction project, project management, project success, program, turnover, project team, success factor, implementation, project manager, constructability |
| Subjects: | project management theory and practice, project controls, profession, production management, construction integration, business management, project delivery, health monitoring assessment and metrics, project completion, software systems, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Time Control, Design Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here