Neural networks as tools in construction

Moselhi, O; Hegazy, T and Fazio, P (1991) Neural networks as tools in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 117(4), pp. 606-625. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The competitive and risk-averse nature of the construction industry and its heuristic problem-solving needs, among other reasons, have contributed to the development of nontraditional decision-making tools. Research in artificial intelligence (AI), a branch of computer science, has provided more suitable tools to the construction industry. Expert systems have steadily been introduced for different applications in the industry. However, the performance of these systems during the last decade, is far from ideal. Neural networks research in AI has recently provided powerful systems that work as a supplement or a complement to such conventional expert systems. In this paper, neural networks are introduced as a promising management tool that can enhance current automation efforts in the construction industry, including expert systems applications. Basic neural network architectures are described, and their potential applications in construction engineering and management discussed. A neural network application is developed for optimum markup estimation. Future possibilities of integrating neural networks and expert systems as a basis for developing efficient intelligent systems are described.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: science, neural network, decision-making, expert system, estimation, intelligent system, heuristic, construction industry, automation, artificial intelligence, construction engineering
Subjects: financial and cost management, artificial intelligence, specialized education, risk assessment, industry analysis, decision analysis, data management, automation and robotics, engineering methods
Topics: Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Cost Management, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Education
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here