Reinschmidt, K F; Griffis, F H and Bronner, P L (1991) Integration of engineering, design, and construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 117(4), pp. 756-772. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The Center for Infrastructure Studies in the School of Engineering at Columbia University and Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation are conducting multidisciplinary research in the integration of three-dimensional computer models in the construction process. This research has the potential to improve the productivity of the construction industry significantly. Whereas manufacturing productivity has increased over the past several decades, construction productivity has declined. Litigation is up, and delays are common and increasingly expensive. Large computer data bases and three-dimensional models of construction projects are now feasible. Computer technology has the potential to revolutionize the methods used by the construction industry: Material quantities are immediately available from the computer model; the constructibility of the design is tested before actual construction; workers build the project on the computer screen before building it in the field; trades are coordinated visually; and progress is reported graphically. Columbia University and Stone & Webster are investigating the employment of this technology by using the construction of Columbia’s new $108,000,000 Center for Engineering and Physical Science Research as a field laboratory. Graduate students in civil, mechanical, electrical, and industrial engineering are working with the construction managers to use this technology on the construction site and to document savings due to its use.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | construction project, construction process, integration, construction manager, graduate student, laboratory, construction site, science, construction productivity, construction industry, productivity, employment, savings, litigation |
| Subjects: | production management, management, industry analysis, organizational analysis, building construction, research management, specialized education, dispute resolution, profession, economic analysis, curriculum design, operations management, work location |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Legal Issues, Human Resources, Education, Site Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here