Smith, G R and Roth, R D (1991) Safety programs and the construction manager. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 117(2), pp. 360-371. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Safety and the coordination of safety programs have traditionally been the responsibility of the general contractor. The overall general contractor direction and coordination of safety programs is not possible in the multiple prime contract environment of construction management. With the construction management form of project management the owner has increased contact with the prime contractors and, therefore, greater liability for directing or coordinating safety programs. The construction manager, while not’in a direct contract relationship with the contractor, acts for the owner relative to project management and assumes some professional liability for project safety management. The nature of this relationship to safety is not well understood by construction managers and indicates that information relevant to the function of the construction manager in safety programs has not been consolidated. This paper identifies how the owner’s liability for safety is developed through the contract documents and court decisions relative to liability. Steps to reduce the potential liability for the owner and construction manager are identified as part of an active safety-management role.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | owner, professional liability, coordination, project management, general contractor, liability, safety programs, safety management, construction manager, contract document |
| Subjects: | profession, practitioner, occupational health and safety management, sociology, liability law, management, contractual condition, project management theory and practice |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Contract Administration, Organizational Design, Health and Safety, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here