Quality management organizations and techniques

Burati, J L; Matthews, M F and Kalidindi, S N (1992) Quality management organizations and techniques. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(1), pp. 112-128. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

To address quality problems and associated costs, the construction industry must pursue and implement innovative quality management organization and techniques. The need for quality management in the construction industry is discussed in the initial sections. Customer satisfaction and continuous improvement, which are the fundamental goals of total quality management (TQM) and thereby the principles on which it is based, are then discussed. Customers can be either external or internal. Internal customers must be satisfied if the final external customer is to be satisfied. Seven fundamental elements that form the framework that support TQM principles are presented. They include: management commitment and leadership, training, teamwork, statistical methods, cost of quality, supplier involvement, and customer service. Commitment and leadership from top management is essential to TQM implementation. The process for implementing TQM in an organization is discussed. Finally, some of the problems related to implementing TQM in the construction industry, such as the transient work force and the competitive bidding environment, are discussed, along with possible solutions.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: customer satisfaction, statistical method, implementation, quality management, construction industry, teamwork, continuous improvement, customer service, top management, total quality management, competitive bidding, commitment
Subjects: evaluation methods, bidding, contractual arrangements, psychology, quality assurance, statistical analysis, industry analysis, service delivery, management, performance measurement
Topics: Project Management, Research Practice, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Quality Management, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here