Cushman, N S; Nam, C H and Tatum, C B (1992) Technology transfer in building construction: case of seismic design. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(1), pp. 129-141. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Many construction innovations incorporate technologies that have been transferred from one geographical area or discipline to another and subsequently modified for the new conditions. This paper analyzes an example of this technology transfer on a sample project: chevron bracing was first used in the structural system of a tall building located in a high seismic zone. This paper describes current technologies for structural systems and the evolution of the unique structural design used for this project. This paper discusses three types of barriers to technology transfer in the U.S. construction industry: building codes, conservatism, and organizational barriers. The focus of this paper is on examining how the project team overcame those barriers. This paper concludes that the teamwork should be based on a reciprocal relationship. Each team member must possess technical competency. It is also vital for each team member to expend efforts to understand not only the technical aspects of the project but the needs and concerns expressed by the other team members. This paper provides insights about the reciprocal relationship and the qualifications of the participants required to surmount barriers to technology transfer in the U.S. construction industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | seismic design, tall building, building construction, evolution, construction innovation, structural design, technology transfer, building code, qualification, teamwork, project team, construction industry |
| Subjects: | construction type, architectural engineering, project delivery, environmental science, knowledge management, educational resources, structural engineering, management, regulatory law, industry analysis, building construction |
| Topics: | Education, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Legal Issues, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here