Role of designers in construction worker safety

Hinze, J and Wiegand, F (1992) Role of designers in construction worker safety. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(4), pp. 677-684. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

In the development of a project, a significant role is played initially by the designer of the project and then by the constructor of the project. Construction worker safety has often been regarded the sole responsibility of the construction contractor. Despite the obvious reasons for placing the primary responsibility on the contractor, the safety performance on a project may well be dictated to a large extent by decisions made by the designer. To investigate this issue of whether designers were sensitive to the safety of construction workers, a survey of major U.S. design firms was conducted assessing the extent to which design decisions are made with specific consideration being given to the safety of construction workers. Of the respondents, only one‐third stated that they made design decisions with the specific intent of improving safety conditions for construction workers. Specific illustrations of such design decisions are given in the paper. The fear of increased litigation is the biggest deterrent to addressing construction worker safety in design decisions. A rationale is developed in the paper for supporting the thesis that designers should consider worker safety in their designs. Suggestions are offered on how construction worker safety might be addressed by more designers.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: survey, design decision, safety performance, construction contractor, litigation, designer, design firm, construction worker, placing
Subjects: profession, data collection methods, dispute resolution, practitioner, occupational health and safety management, concrete and cementitious materials, design practice
Topics: Research Practice, Construction Materials, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions, Legal Issues, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here