Bored tunneling for Singapore metro

Hulme, T W and Burchell, A J (1992) Bored tunneling for Singapore metro. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(2), pp. 363-384. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

This paper describes the planning, layout, and implementation of the Singapore Metro mass-transit system, emphasizing the criticality of the 22.4 km of bored tunneling required in the central area of the city. The original nine-year construction schedule and the subsequent seven-year accelerated program that was adopted are discussed, as are the extent of the tunneling works and the limited construction period of 3-1/3 years. The contractual arrangements for carrying out the works are outlined. The opportunity afforded by this concentration of soft-ground tunneling activity to compare performance in 38 tunnel drives, all of which excavated almost simultaneously in widely varying geological conditions, is considered unique. Factual details are provided covering the geological conditions along the tunnel drives, the contract packages, the tunnel profile, the tunneling methods, compressed-air equipment and procedures, spoil-handling equipment, temporary and permanent support, and water-sealing techniques. Settlements are reviewed, and tunneling performance for each drive is detailed. Some general conclusions are drawn from the owner’s viewpoint to assist in ensuring the timely and efficient completion of tunneled works in a complex transportation project.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: implementation, transportation project, owner, tunnel, program, package, Singapore
Subjects: Geography, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, contractual arrangements, software systems
Topics: Digital Applications, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here