Predicting construction contractor failure prior to contract award

Russell, J S and Jaselskis, E J (1992) Predicting construction contractor failure prior to contract award. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(4), pp. 791-811. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

This paper discusses items that can aid owners in predicting the chance of construction contractor failure prior to contract award and thus assist them in the evaluation process. A predictive contractor failure model has been developed and is discussed. The model predicts the probability of contractor failure at the project level; failure is defined as a significant breach of the contractor's legal reponsibilities to the owner (for example, bankruptcy or material breach of contract related to meeting desired project objectives such as cost, schedule, and quality). Data for the model development were collected using two questionnare surveys. The modeling method involves the use of discrete choice logistic regression. Results show that four variables are strong predictors of contractor failure: (1) The amount of owner-contractor evaluation; (2) whether cost monitoring was performed by the owner; (3) the level of support received by the project manager from the contractor's senior management throughout the course of the project; and (4) the early involvement of the contractor's project manager. The model was validated using an additional 36 projects.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: monitoring, bankruptcy, modelling, logistic regression, project manager, owner, construction contractor, model development, breach of contract, survey
Subjects: analytical methods, economic analysis, data collection methods, profession, control systems, dispute resolution, practitioner, sociology, statistical analysis
Topics: Site Management, Legal Issues, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here