Moselhi, O; Hegazy, T and Fazio, P (1993) DBID: Analogy-based dss for bidding in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119(3), pp. 466-479. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper presents a decision-support system (DSS) that aids contractors in preparing competitive bids for building projects. The DSS uses neural networks for markup estimation that derive solutions for new bid situations based on analogy with past projects using information elicited from contractors in Canada and the United States. The neural networks were trained to generalize the projects‛ knowledge and thus become able to predict the outcomes of a project when fed with the contractor‛s assessment of various project risks. The proposed DSS is coded in a user-friendly software called DBID. The software enables the contractor to retrain the neural networks on some of his or her past bid encounters and accordingly adapt the model to his or her own environment. In estimating the optimum markup for a new project, the uncertainty in the contractor’s assessment of project risks is accounted for by a sensitivity analysis conducted using the Monte Carlo simulation technique. Such analysis produces a measure of the probability of winning at any desired level of markup. The capabilities of the present DSS are demonstrated through an example application.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | Monte Carlo simulation, Canada, estimation, bidding, estimating, United States, sensitivity analysis, neural network |
| Subjects: | Geography, environmental hazards, modelling and simulation, financial and cost management, bidding, artificial intelligence |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Procurement, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Cost Management, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here