Simulation technologies for planning heavy construction processes

Vanegas, J A; Bravo, E B and Halpin, D W (1993) Simulation technologies for planning heavy construction processes. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119(2), pp. 336-354. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Heavy construction projects, such as dams and tunnels, closely integrate design and” construction and require the project manager or the project engineer to be knowledgeable and familiar with: (1) Different types of heavy construction plant and equipment; and (2) different construction methods that may be applicable to a given project. However, to effectively define these two elements, different possible scenarios, under different conditions and constraints, must be explored with both a technology and process focus, and a resource use focus. This task requires the development of descriptive, analytical, and decision-making models, which accurately represent and simulate these processes, and experimentation with different alternatives under different conditions. Until relatively recently, the analytical and operational tools that have been available to practitioners to achieve this, have been complex and difficult to learn and use. The Cyclic Operations Network (CYCLONE) microcomputer-based simulation methodology presents aviable alternative to overcome these barriers. This paper describes the implementation of this system within the division of project planning and control of a large Spanish heavy construction firm, using two specific case-study applications.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: experiment, construction method, tunnel, project planning, methodology, decision-making, practitioner, project engineer, project manager, cyclone, heavy construction, implementation, plant and equipment
Subjects: climate science, control systems, practitioner, data collection methods, profession, contractual arrangements, research methods, manufacturing engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, building construction, decision analysis
Topics: Site Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Procurement, Sustainability, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here