Source evaluation of solid waste in building construction

Gavilan, R M and Bernold, L E (1994) Source evaluation of solid waste in building construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 120(3), pp. 536-552. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The construction industry contributes a major portion of the waste stream in the United States. Both increased environmental awareness and increased cost for depositing waste have caused many construction companies to reevaluate their practices. So far, no scientific data are available for developing strategies to adjust to the changing parameters and requirements. This paper addresses one critical step in developing a comprehensive waste-management system; the categorization and quantification of construction wastes. Several residential-building projects were used to test a conceptual framework for studying the sources of solid wastes in one important segment of the construction industry. Three important categories of building materials—brick and block, dimensional lumber, and Sheetrock—were analyzed using a “sources-of-waste” framework. The presented research data indicate that solid wastes in residential construction are primarily scraps resulting from cutting dimensional stock material (e.g., lumber) to size. As will be shown, many factors are related to the amount of such process waste. Strong relationships between poor productivity and high waste generation are suggested.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: stream, process waste, conceptual framework, management system, United States, solid wastes, construction company, strategy, building construction, residential construction, building material, environmental awareness, construction waste, construction industry, quantification, waste generation, productivity
Subjects: industry analysis, measurement and scaling, building construction, health safety and environment, Geography, water management, construction integration, theoretical framing, management, environmental behaviour, building materials, waste management, environmental impact, organization
Topics: Design Practice, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here