Gordon, C M (1994) Choosing appropriate construction contracting method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 120(1), pp. 196-210. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper examines the compatibility of various construction contracting methods with certain types of owners and projects. Contracting methods, as defined in this paper, consist of four parts: scope, organization, contract, and award. An owner must create an appropriate contracting method for each project. It was determined that there are six main organizations around which the contracting variations are created: general contractor, construction manager, multiple primes, design-build, turnkey, and build-operate-transfer. The most common method is the traditional system of an independent designer, a general contractor, and a competitively bid, lump-sum price. This method is efficient in many cases; however, in some situations, alternative methods are more appropriate and should be explored. Choosing certain methods can decrease the project duration, provide flexibility for changes, reduce adversarial relationships, allow for contractor participation in design, provide cost savings incentives to the contractor, and provide alternative financing methods. Guidelines are established to help the owner choose the organization, contract type, and award method most applicable for their project and themselves.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | designer, variation, general contractor, contracting method, cost saving, duration, financing, owner, construction manager, build-operate-transfer |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, sociology, contractual arrangements, economics, contractual condition, profession, practitioner, project controls |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Cost Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here