Chan, C T W and Pasquire, C (2002) Estimation of project overheads: A contractor’s perspective. In: Greenwood, D (ed.) Proceedings of 18th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2002, Northumbria, UK.
Abstract
Project overheads are the general cost of administering a project including provision of general plant, site staff and site-based services. An accurate estimation of the project overheads not only helps to improve the chance of success in bidding, but also serves as a profit centre for the contractor. However, a lot of contractors often overlook the importance of project overheads estimation due to its apparently low percentage contribution to the contract sum. The aims of this study are to explore the estimation method of project overheads practiced by the large contractors in Hong Kong, to identify project overhead items that are likely to be over- or under-estimated. The research is based on a survey followed by interviews within 49 large contractors in Hong Kong. The data collected confirmed that detailed estimation based on professional judgement was the most common method used by the estimators for estimating project overheads. The results indicated a strong misalignment between the perceived importance of project overheads estimation and the level of resources allocated to project overheads estimation by the contractors. Project overhead items like site management salaries, protection to works, and site cleaning were identified by the contractors as being significant in terms of inaccurate estimation. A framework of 23 project overhead items was generated to provide a basis for further study of project overheads estimation.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | estimating; project overheads; risk management |
| Index terms: | site staff, profit, bidding, estimating, survey, Hong Kong, estimation, site management, cleaning, overheads, interview, misalignment, risk management, estimator |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, financial and cost management, construction operations, engineering problems, bidding, profession, risk assessment, Geography, practitioner, financial analysis, maintenance engineering, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Procurement, Cost Management, Site Management, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here