Gugel, J G and Russell, J S (1994) Model for constructability approach selection. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 120(3), pp. 509-521. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper presents a model for selecting an approach to implement constructability. Constructability can be implemented using an informal or formal approach. Based upon this research, three approaches, one informal and two formal, have been identified and labeled as follows: (1) Informal approach; (2) formal project level; and (3) comprehensive tracking. The model consists of a hierarchy of decision levels. Within these levels, there exist three steps: (1) Individual assessment of owner and project characteristics resulting in a conclusion of informal or formal; (2) combining owner and project characteristics into a single conclusion of informal or formal; and (3) if formal is concluded, a decision as to whether it is formal project-level or comprehensive tracking. To assess owner and project characteristics, a framework of variables described by parameters has been developed. The characteristics of an owner consist of four variables: (1) Owner type; (2) objectives; (3) in-house expertise; and (4) constructability resources. The characteristics of a project are described by six variables: (1) Construction type; (2) contracting strategy; (3) project size; (4) technical difficulty; (5) location; and (6) peculiarities. The model was tested by six owners on seven different projects. The results were consistent with the constructability approach selected by the owner. The model can assist owners in efficiently determining the appropriate means by which to incorporate construction knowledge and experience into the designs of their projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | owner, constructability, strategy |
| Subjects: | sociology, construction integration, management |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here