Ndekugri, I and Turner, A (1994) Building procurement by design and build approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 120(2), pp. 243-256. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
As a method of procuring buildings, the design and build approach accounts for an increasing proportion of building construction output in the United Kingdom. This paper reports a survey of contractors, designers, and building clients regarding design and build issues. These issues include the circumstances in which the approach would be suitable, the project organizations commonly employed on design and build projects, the difficulties commonly encountered by practitioners, and the attitudes of the construction professionals to the procurement route. The main findings of the research are as follows: (1) The use of design and build is on the increase with many clients perceiving it as providing better value for money and giving rise to less disputes than other procurement methods; (2) the approach can be used satisfactorily with most sizes of projects provided the client is experienced; (3) although more and more of the construction professionals accept the approach, there is still considerable resistance to its use; (4) the few disputes encountered have concerned abortive work, inaccuracies in the client’s brief, conflict between the brief and the contractor’s proposal, and valuation of variations; and (5) a clear brief is the most important prerequisite for success.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | dispute, procurement method, building procurement, building construction, designer, construction professional, practitioner, project organization, value-for-money, proposal, United Kingdom, design and build, valuation of variation, survey |
| Subjects: | Geography, profession, dispute resolution, data collection methods, contract management, practitioner, project planning, evaluation, building construction, organizational theory, professional development, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Geographical Context, Procurement, Value Management, Legal Issues, Construction Technology, Project Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here