Woolery, J C (1994) Developing specifications for cellular-telephone base stations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 120(3), pp. 593-602. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The emergence and continued growth of the cellular-telephone and related telecommunications industry has been phenomenal. The cellular industry has the potential of evolving into a “100-year industry,” as did wire telephone, radio, and television. New systems (networks) continue to be built, and there is a continuous need to expand existing systems (networks). A cell is the basic building block of a cellular-telephone system (network). Each cell contains a base station (cell site), which provides transmitting and receiving facilities. This paper discusses various factors that are unique to the development of specifications for sites, buildings, and building improvements used for cellular-telephone base stations (cell sites). The discussion is limited to the equipment shelter or building, applicable site work, the tower or antenna mounts, and the alternating-current electrical system with a possible generator backup system. The objective of this paper is to provide insight relevant to the special considerations required in the development of specifications for cellular-telephone base stations (cell sites).
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | specification, emergence, telecommunication, site work |
| Subjects: | communication, site logistics, systems engineering, contractual condition |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Site Management, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here