Cozens, P; Waters, J and Neale, R (2002) A virtual reality approach to personal safety and the design of built environment facilities. In: Greenwood, D (ed.) Proceedings of 18th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2002, Northumbria, UK.
Abstract
The Suzy Lamplugh Trust Research Institute at the University of Glamorgan is conducting research that focuses on personal safety issues as they relate to the design and maintenance of built environment facilities. The project, funded by Valley Lines (a network of 66 railway stations in South Wales) seeks to investigate the perception and reality of personal safety (against crime and nuisance, as opposed to health and safety) on these stations and their immediate access routes and environments. Customer satisfaction surveys have consistently reported that although recorded incidents of crime and nuisance are relatively low, rail users perceive their risk to be significantly higher and therefore discourages people from using the trains. The project uses interactive virtual reality (VR) scenes as the environmental stimuli for investigating perceptions. VR 'walkthroughs' of a sample of stations have been shown to focus groups representing samples of users and potential users. The standardization of the 'personal journey' to, from and through the station represented by this approach and its 'dynamic' (rather than static) and interactive nature, make it a realistic avenue for evaluating how people decode the railway environment in personal safety terms. A pilot study for three stations was very encouraging and illuminating. The respondents provided a rich source of data, concerning their personal safety concerns in and around the station environment and the findings broadly support Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) theory. It also highlights the crucial importance of user perceptions in the design and management of built environment facilities. This methodology will also be employed to investigate perceptions of personal safety within the University campus environment, its immediate environment and access routes. Within this community, fear of crime has been shown to exist in locations where, according to recorded statistics, crime is low. Therefore, the objective is to develop applied solutions to improve personal safety on the campus. Finally a package of recommended solutions and a generic model shall be developed that can analyse problems and generate solutions to any campus University.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | crime; facilities management; personal safety; virtual reality walk-through scenes |
| Index terms: | safety issue, research institute, environmental design, survey, railway station, focus group, crime prevention, package, health and safety, facilities management, statistics, Wales, nuisance, standardization, methodology, virtual reality, built environment, customer satisfaction |
| Subjects: | regulatory law, infrastructure and transport systems, research methods, management, performance measurement, financial risk, Geography, health safety and environment, service delivery, sustainability and energy, contractual arrangements, mathematical modelling, virtual reality, data collection methods, research organizations, criminal law |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Procurement, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here