Effects of delay times on production rates in construction

Christian, J and Hachey, D (1995) Effects of delay times on production rates in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 121(1), pp. 20-26. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Factors that can be fairly easily identified and modified and can lead to significant improvements in production rates for activities in construction are considered in this paper. These factors are divided into four work categories. Two of the four work categories in which each construction activity was subdivided were idle and waiting times. Productivity measurements generally do not distinguish between the idle and waiting times. Conclusions can therefore be misleading. and more importantly, the attention of management is only vaguely and imprecisely directed to the cause of the inefficiencies. The breakdown of nonproductive time into two factors is therefore very important in directing the attention of management to the root causes of inefficient time. The variation in production rates used by contractors' estimators are given and compared with actual on-site production rates. The frequency of different sources of information used by contractors when estimating production rates, and the percentage use of production monitoring methods. are also given. A prototype expert system. using the Personal Consultant Plus shell program of 1987. was developed to assist in the acquisition and management of knowledge and data for the estimation of production rates.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: estimation, monitoring, estimating, productivity, program, variation, prototype, expert system, estimator, construction activity, acquisition
Subjects: business, management, construction operations, software systems, modelling and simulation, financial and cost management, data management, control systems, contractual condition, profession
Topics: Digital Applications, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Contract Administration, Engineering Principles, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here