Ed Koehn, E; Kothari, R K and Pan, C S (1995) Safety in developing countries: Professional and bureaucratic problems. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 121(3), pp. 261-265. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
In the United States, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) was created to enhance safety in the workplace. Employers are subject to OSHA site inspections and must conform to a set of comprehensive rules and regulations. In contrast, in a developing country such as India, comprehensive and universal safety regulations have not been developed. Workers are generally unskilled or semiskilled, poorly paid, temporarily employed, exhibit low production (productivity) rates, and often migrate in a group from one place to another in search of work. Typically, laborers are not trained in safe work practices, and there tends to be a lack of management commitment to safety programs and various safety procedures. In contrast, in a newly developed country such as Taiwan, the owner and the contractor are assigned joint responsibility for claims resulting from occupational accidents. A basic safety-control system, emphasizing the establishment of a safety committee and self inspection, has been developed to control project safety. This system may be universally applicable to both developed and developing regions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | productivity, owner, inspection, occupational safety and health, occupational accident, India, safe work practice, Taiwan, United States, developing country, commitment, regulation, developed country, control system, safety programs |
| Subjects: | psychology, occupational health and safety management, sociology, quality assurance, political science, health risk and incident analysis, management, monitoring and control, Geography, health safety and environment, development economics |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Governance, Stakeholder Management, International Construction, Quality Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here