Herbsman, Z J; Chen, W T and Epstein, W C (1995) Time is money: Innovative contracting methods in highway construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 121(3), pp. 273-281. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
In today's highway construction industry, the focus has shifted from building new transportation facilities to resurfacing, rehabilitating and restoring (3R's) those already in existence. These types of projects create a serious disruption in the normal flow of traffic resulting in a major inconvenience to the traveling public. Reducing construction time, thereby mitigating this inconvenience, has become a major emphasis for state highway agencies throughout the United States. In the past few years, several innovative contracting methods have been introduced into the highway construction industry. The basic concept of these innovative techniques is the motivation they provide encouraging the contractor to work faster, schedule accurately, and manage the construction process better. Results from the research conducted by the writers indicate that recent transportation projects constructed utilizing these innovative contracting methods have been very successful in reducing construction time, while only increasing overall construction costs minimally, if at all. This paper examines the advantages and disadvantages of these methods analyzing data obtained from various case studies throughout the United States and abroad.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | construction time, case study, highway construction, construction cost, transportation project, construction process, United States, agency, contracting method, motivation |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, building construction, Geography, civil engineering, sociology, financial and cost management, project controls, psychology, infrastructure and transport systems, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Site Management, Geographical Context, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Time Control, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here