Analysis of fatalities recorded by OSHA

Hinze, J and Russell, D B (1995) Analysis of fatalities recorded by OSHA. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 121(2), pp. 209-214. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has had the long-standing mandate to promulgate standards and to enforce them. Another mandate is for OSHA to collect injury and illness information. While vast amounts of information have been collected over the past two decades, only isolated studies have been conducted to evaluate that information. An independent study was conducted on selected injury data pertinent to the construction industry. This analysis focused on those areas in which the greatest numbers of violations have been recorded and those in which the greatest number of fatalities have occurred. This examination of the data revealed some interesting trends. Some of the findings confirmed the work of other research efforts and others appear to be unique to this study. The injury data can be useful to identify key areas that warrant special attention. Falls continue to be the major cause of fatalities. Safety efforts must be focused on fall protection if dramatic improvements in safety performance are to be made. Through the examination of the existing data it was concluded that the injury data is not consistently coded and this leads to less meaningful information.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: violation, safety performance, injury, mandate, fatalities, construction industry, occupational safety and health, illness, falls
Subjects: health risk and incident analysis, political science, regulatory law, industry analysis, health conditions and diseases, occupational health and safety management
Topics: Legal Issues, Governance, Research Practice, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 2 CT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here