Riley, D R and Sanvido, V E (1995) Patterns of construction-space use in multistory buildings. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 121(4), pp. 464-473. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This research presents a construction-space model that defines a collection of descriptive space types and typical patterns of space use in multistory building construction. Recent space-planning research describes characteristics of space and provides simple models of space demand for construction work to support automated space-planning methods. These simplified models cannot accurately represent the space needed for complex networks of work and material-handling activities in multistory buildings. The construction-space model identifies 12 construction-activity space uses, and their typical patterns. Repeatable patterns of space needs are recognizable and often occur independently in core, floor area, and perimeter work zones. The construction-space model characterizes these space needs to predict space demand, and thus supports the logical planning of productive work sequences. Through case-study research and site observation, the space model was found to accurately represent the use of space by construction activities in multistory building construction. If applied on site, this research helps construction managers plan and manage space.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | building construction, construction manager, construction activity, construction work, planning method |
| Subjects: | profession, urban planning, building construction, construction operations, operations management |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Governance, Site Management, Project Management, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 1 P |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here