Shapira, A (1995) Rational design of shoring-tower-based formwork. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 121(3), pp. 255-260. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Although formwork based on high shoring towers is a very common solution for forming elevated slabs and other concrete elements over high spaces, the trade literature furnishes neither detailed guidelines nor basic cost data for the design of such formwork. The present paper presents a method for the design of elevated-slab formwork using scaffold-type towers as the vertical shoring element. The method includes the definition of a basic tower layout and its properties, an algorithm for determining the distances between the various elements of the formwork, and key information as a basis for economic evaluation of alternate design solutions. Whereas the algorithm directly solves a general case of a flat, nonconstrained slab, the method as a whole readily applies to elevated slabs and other high-rise concrete elements of any kind. The method has been found particularly useful when computerized. It may become even more important when incorporated into an intelligent design system that will take into account shape and load constraints exerted by particular cases.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | formwork, cost data, economic evaluation |
| Subjects: | financial analysis, accounting and finance, building construction |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here