Modeling project performance for decision making

Alarćon, L F and Ashley, D B (1996) Modeling project performance for decision making. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 122(3), pp. 265-273. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

This paper presents a performance modeling methodology for application to individual projects. The model combines experience captured from experts with assessments from the project team. The methodology consists of a conceptual, qualitative-model structure and a mathematical-model structure. The conceptual-model structure, called the general performance model (GPM), is a simplified model of the variables and interaction that influence project performance. The mathematical model uses concepts of cross-impact analysis and probabilistic inference to capture the uncertainties and interactions among project variables. The GPM allows management to test different combinations of project-execution options and predict expected cost, schedule, and other performance impacts. The methodology provides a systematic and structured process for a project-team discussion on relevant planning issues in a project. Researchers should benefit from the exploratory and analytical capabilities of the methodology, as well as the flexible knowledge structure to update models and data. Computer implementation is also attractive as a means to disseminating research results.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: mathematical model, impact analysis, methodology, decision-making, interaction, implementation, modelling, option, project team, project performance
Subjects: mathematical modelling, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, analytical methods, project delivery, research methods, project management theory and practice, decision analysis, behavioral psychology
Topics: Risk Management, Procurement, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here