Multiple heavy lifts optimization

Lin, K L and Haas, C T (1996) Multiple heavy lifts optimization. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 122(4), pp. 354-362. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Heavy lift planning has a major impact on construction sequencing, scheduling, budgeting, and safety. This paper addresses problems presented by planning for multiple lifts on a single jobsite. This is a common and particularly challenging planning situation because of the complex trade-offs involved. Conventional intuitive planning procedures lead to suboptimal plans or plans ranked with little quantitative or objective measure. This paper first introduces various factors affecting planning decisions for multiple heavy lifts and then presents an interactive computer-aided process to optimize initial crane configurations and placement locations for multiple lift problems. In the computer-aided planning process, the minimal number of equipment relocations is determined based on an integer programming model, and the precise equipment locations are optimized with an interactive procedure using objective performance functions. Objectives involve cost, safety, and area interference (area sterilization). These optimization procedures are implemented in the critical operations planning environment (COPE). A case study is used to demonstrate the optimization process. It is concluded, based on a case study and external reviews, that the process and algorithms presented help produce good plans for multiple heavy lifts on construction sites.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: configuration, construction site, relocation, budgeting, placement, scheduling, integer programming, planning process, case study
Subjects: market analysis, project controls, systems engineering, algorithms, financial management, management, operations research, work location, data collection methods
Topics: Site Management, Time Control, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here