Project-network analysis using fuzzy sets theory

Lorterapong, P and Moselhi, O (1996) Project-network analysis using fuzzy sets theory. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 122(4), pp. 308-317. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Estimating the durations of construction activities requires experts knowledge. Statements used by these experts usually contain some sort of imprecision. Previous studies have demonstrated the use of fuzzy set theory for quantifying the imprecision associated with the durations of project activities. These studies, however, did not address the processing of this information for generating a complete schedule. This paper presents a new network scheduling method based on fuzzy sets theory. The proposed method incorporates a number of new techniques that facilitate: (1) the representation of imprecise activity durations; (2) the calculation of scheduling parameters; and (3) the interpretation of the fuzzy results generated. Two network examples are worked out to illustrate the use of the proposed method, and to compare its capabilities with Monte Carlo simulation. The results indicate that the proposed method is capable of providing schedules that can appropriately account for the nature as well as the type of uncertainties normally encountered in construction projects. The results are in close agreement with those obtained using Monte Carlo simulation. The calculations are, however, more simple, requiring less computational effort than that needed in Monte Carlo simulation. The proposed method is practical and can be easily computerized.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: construction project, estimating, scheduling, duration, network scheduling, network analysis, construction activity, Monte Carlo simulation, fuzzy set, fuzzy set theory
Subjects: project controls, decision-making and optimization, production management, modelling and simulation, operations research, construction operations, data analysis and analytics, financial and cost management
Topics: Cost Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Site Management, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here