Francis, V (2002) Supportive organizations: Assessing their effect on civil engineers. In: Greenwood, D (ed.) Proceedings of 18th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2002, Northumbria, UK.
Abstract
In the past sixty years the relationship between work and family life, particularly in western industrialized countries, has undergone revolutionary changes. The number of workers with dependant care responsibilities has never before been so high and many struggle to balance their responsibilities as employees with those of parents or carers. Many of the job and organizational factors found to be negatively associated with family functioning are pertinent to civil engineers. Research suggests that work-family balance practices can enhance organizational attachment, improve job performance, increase job satisfaction and lower absenteeism and turnover. However it has also been shown that factors embedded in a company’s organizational culture can undermine these policies rendering them ineffective. Research is underway in at the University of Melbourne to provide a better understanding of work and family issues in the civil engineering profession and in particular the effect of organizational culture. This research area has received little attention to date and the proposed quantitative study will survey 1000 members of the Australian civil engineering profession. The rationale for the work and the methodology being adopted, including details of the proposed measurement scales, are outlined.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | civil engineering; organizational culture; women; family; human resources |
| Index terms: | organizational culture, profession, human resource, methodology, women, civil engineer, job satisfaction, survey, turnover, organizational factor, absenteeism |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, profession, business, institututions, business management, management, research methods, sociology |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here