Walker, K K; Schexnayder, C; Mayo, R E and Walsh, K D (1996) Methods and procedural considerations in demolishing tall concrete chimneys. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 122(3), pp. 223-230. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper reports on a study of possible demolition methods for tall concrete chimneys. In particular it discusses a case where the adjoining plant functions had to remain fully operational during the demolition process. Therefore, both operational and cost concerns in relation to demolition methods and procedures are discussed. In fact, operational risk factors can be critical in the selection of demolition methods. It was found that when diamond sawing was chosen as the method for demolishing reinforced-concrete structures, the cutting pattern can have a significant impact on project cost.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | risk factor, concrete structure, project cost |
| Subjects: | environmental hazards, economics, structural engineering |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 1 C |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here