Chua, D K H; Kog, Y C; Loh, P K and Jaselskis, E J (1997) Model for construction budget performance: neural network approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 123(3), pp. 214-222. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
A neural network approach is used to identify the key management factors that affect budget performance in a project. Field data of project performance has been used to build the budget performance model. This approach allows the model to be built even if the functional interrelationships between input factors and output performance cannot be clearly defined. Altogether eight key determining factors were identified covering areas related to the project manager, project team, and planning and control efforts, namely: number of organizational levels between project manager and craftsmen, project manager experience on similar technical scope, detailed design complete at start of construction, constructability program, project team turnover rate, frequency of control meetings during construction, frequency of budget updates, and control system budget. The model is able to give good predictions even with previously unseen data and incomplete information on the key factors. The model can be used to evaluate various management strategies and thus resources can be effectively deployed to strengthen these aspects of project management.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | craft worker, constructability, project team, project management, project performance, construction budget, management strategy, project manager, program, control system, neural network, turnover |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, project delivery, business management, artificial intelligence, practitioner, profession, project management theory and practice, monitoring and control, construction integration, software systems, management |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Project Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here