Workers' comp. Premiums: Disparities in penalties for identical losses

Everett, J G and Yang, I T (1997) Workers' comp. Premiums: Disparities in penalties for identical losses. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 123(3), pp. 312-317. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Workers' compensation insurance (WCI) is one of the largest controllable costs for construction contractors. A fixed portion of the WCI standard premium is determined by the individual contractor's company characteristics, including type of work performed, wage rates, and company size. The variable portion of the standard premium reflects the individual contractor's safety record or loss experience. The variable portion is really the sum of a number of surcharges or penalties, one for each actual loss the contractor experiences. This paper examines these penalties in detail. The paper shows that the magnitude of each penalty is based not just on the magnitude of the corresponding actual loss, but also on company characteristics. The result is that different contractors end up paying vastly different penalties for identical actual losses.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: penalty, construction contractor, compensation, disparity, insurance
Subjects: social justice, dispute resolution, regulatory law, practitioner, economic analysis
Topics: Business Strategy, Ethics, Roles and Professions, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here