Fischer, M A and Tatum, C B (1997) Characteristics of design-relevant constructability knowledge. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 123(3), pp. 253-260. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Constructability should be an important objective in all phases of a construction project, and designers play an important role in achieving superior constructability. Most projects, however, do not receive constructability input though prior research has demonstrated the benefits of such input. One reason for this lack of constructability input, we argue, is the lack of formal, explicit constructability knowledge bases that link constructability issues to design decisions and that can be made available on-line to interested parties. This paper describes research that compiled and formalized constructability knowledge related to reinforced concrete structures. To ensure appropriate and specific constructability input, we classified the knowledge by construction methods and structural elements. To make this specific knowledge available to designers at the right time during design development, we further divided it into the five groups: application heuristics, layout knowledge, dimensioning knowledge, detailing knowledge, and exogenous knowledge. This classification leads to conclusions regarding the ability to collect and formalize this knowledge, and to make it readily available to designers to improve project performance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | reinforced concrete, construction project, design decision, knowledge base, construction method, project performance, constructability, design development, heuristic, designer |
| Subjects: | information systems, building construction, project management theory and practice, design process, production management, construction integration, design practice, building materials, risk assessment, profession |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Construction Materials, Project Management, Site Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here