Huang, X and Bernold, L E (1997) CAD-integrated excavation and pipe laying. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 123(3), pp. 318-323. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Excavation and, in particular, trenching using backhoes represents a hazardous working environment for workers. The hazards include trench walls that collapse, the accidental drop of heavy objects into the opening, excavators and other equipment that become unstable, and buried utilities that are damaged during the operation. The three main accident prevention efforts used today are the use of the trench box, inspection, and the training of the site personnel. The work discussed in this paper is the result of a search for a more revolutionary prevention method: one that does not require a worker to enter the open trench. This paper presents the development and testing of a computer-aided design (CAD) integrated trenching and pipe-laying system. The successful testing of the first prototype could lay the foundation for safer and more productive trenching operations in the future.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | prototype, accident prevention, personnel, computer aided design, utilities, testing, prevention, excavation, inspection |
| Subjects: | environmental health, financial risk, management, modelling and simulation, computational design, professional practice, quality assurance, construction operations, construction type |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Site Management, Quality Management, Human Resources, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here