Jaafari, A (1997) Concurrent construction and life cycle project management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 123(4), pp. 427-436. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper investigates "concurrent construction" and its potential application in life cycle management of capital projects. The construction industry is under pressure to reduce project delivery times and costs despite increased uncertainties, ambiguities, and complexities that surround today's projects. Concurrent construction may well hold the key to success on this front. Concurrent construction is based on integrating all project phases into a single phase. It starts with the definition of a product model and division of the project into major parts or systems accordingly. Each part or system is entrusted to a team consisting of members drawn from the relevant disciplines as well as the contractor. The delivery of a specific part is carried out by the relevant team in an integrated fashion in a single phase. While the potential benefits of concurrent construction are beyond doubt, current contractual, organizational, and work method barriers militate against realizing these. However, there are workable solutions to these problems. This paper covers examples of approaches that could overcome these barriers.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | capital project, construction industry, concurrent construction, project management, project delivery, life cycle, complexity, product model, life cycle management |
| Subjects: | value management, project delivery, strategic project management, operations management, modelling and simulation, project management theory and practice, systems engineering, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Site Management, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here