Kartarn, S; Ballard, G and Ibbs, C W (1997) Introducing a new concept and approach to modeling construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 123(1), pp. 89-97. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Modeling construction is a critical step for understanding it and improving its performance. The thrust of this research paper is the need for the development of valid credible models as a logical precursor to automation. This article reviews the key models used to represent construction. Through this examination, it makes an important distinction between process and system modeling concepts. This distinction is the basis for concluding that no single tool, by itself, is accurately capable of fully modeling both construction system and construction work processes. Thus an integrated approach to modeling is required. Accordingly, the research conducted by the writers utilized a new integrated modeling approach that combines a set of descriptive tools to allow the development of various perspectives of construction. This article presents one of these tools as a new system modeling concept that overcomes deficiencies in current system modeling approaches. The power of this new model is illustrated in a detailed comparison among key current system modeling concepts.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | construction work, modelling, automation, research paper, integrated approach, construction system |
| Subjects: | analytical methods, contractual arrangements, operations management, research dissemination and communication, building construction, automation and robotics |
| Topics: | Procurement, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here