Peng, J L; Yen, T; Lin, Y; Wu, K L and Chen, W F (1997) Performance of scaffold frame shoring under pattern loads and load paths. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 123(2), pp. 138-145. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This research examines the behavior of a large full-scale scaffold frame shoring subjected to pattern loads with various load paths. In this test program, sand bags were placed on the top of the scaffold frame shoring to simulate the weight of fresh concrete during construction. The routes of placing sand bags are based on the paths of placing fresh concrete in actual construction sites. The test results show that the axial tube forces of scaffolds just below the location of a newly placed sand bag increase sharply. In addition, the axial tube forces do not change significantly when sand bags are placed at other positions on formwork during the load path. It is shown that the effect of influence surfaces on the scaffold frame shoring is not apparent during the placing of sand bags. In addition, the maximum axial tube force of a scaffold subjected to different load paths is very close to the maximum axial tube force of this specific scaffold after the completion of the loading path. Thus, a typical uniform load as used for an applied concrete load in design can replace the actual fresh concrete pattern load during construction. Both lateral forces acted at the top of a scaffold frame shoring and the sidesway of scaffolds are small during tests. The regions of some larger axial forces in the scaffold frame shoring vary in different load paths.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | tube, program, construction site, loading, sand, placing, formwork |
| Subjects: | materials science, construction operations, building materials, work location, concrete and cementitious materials, software systems, building construction |
| Topics: | Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Digital Applications, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here