Riley, D R and Sanvido, V E (1997) Space planning method for multistory building construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 123(2), pp. 171-180. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper presents a space planning method for multistory building construction. Current formal space planning in practice is limited to site layout and logistics, where space is needed for activities for extended periods of time. The space planning needed to sequence activities inside a building under construction is often neglected. The proposed space planning method is a manual method that provides a logical order and priority for space planning decisions. This helps a construction planner to: (1) identify the specific spaces needed for activities; (2) define locations for these spaces on building floors; (3) develop a sequence of work that defines the order spaces are occupied; and (4) identify potential spatial conflicts. Detail is added to the plan as needed. Through evaluation of 74 activities on four case study projects, the proposed method was found to be an accurate representation of the planning needed in multistory building construction. Two applications of the planning method identified interference problems before they occurred in the field. This space planning method offers construction managers a useful technique to develop efficient interior sequences that minimize interference and work space congestion.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | space planning, construction planner, construction manager, site layout, building floor, building construction, case study, planning method |
| Subjects: | building construction, architectural elements, design process, urban planning, site logistics, profession, data collection methods, practitioner |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Governance, Construction Technology, Design Practice, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here