Strategic issues for facility provision: A re-examination of the nimby phenomenon

Heywood, C; Missingham, G and Kenley, R (2002) Strategic issues for facility provision: A re-examination of the nimby phenomenon. In: Greenwood, D (ed.) Proceedings of 18th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2002, Northumbria, UK.

Abstract

The conflict between the provision of facilities that provide public service and the community responses to those facilities is of crucial concern to those planning and managing such facilities. The NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) phenomenon exemplifies a community response to the provision of facilities intended to provide public service. The facilities may be provided either by government or the private sector. This paper uses content analysis to examine the language used in the public domain from a recent NIMBY case in Melbourne, Victoria and the NIMBY literature. The NIMBY literature contains approaches that treat the responses to facilities as reasoned and rational, the result of ignorance, or are irrational and selfish. A re-examination of the language used shows that this is a limited interpretation of the responses. The public domain language from the local newspaper provides a case study of the, particularly, community responses to the issue of facility provision. A number of response modes are possible, however, the language used in both instances suggests that affective responses are a dominant response mode. An understanding of affective responses to facility provision is important to providers of such facilities and the strategic management of their processes in planning for and providing service facilities.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: community; conflict; facilities management; government; nimby; strategic management
Index terms: strategic management, facilities management, community response, case study, newspaper, content analysis, private sector, Victoria
Subjects: data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, regions and continents, management, industry analysis, communities and social development, sociology
Topics: Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here