Optimization modeling for sewer network management

Abraham, D M; Wirahadikusumah, R; Short, T J and Shahbahrami, S (1998) Optimization modeling for sewer network management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(5), pp. 402-410. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Due to their low visibility, sanitary sewers' condition assessment and rehabilitation are frequently neglected until a catastrophic failure occurs. Neglecting regular maintenance of these underground utilities adds to life-cycle costs and liabilities, and in extreme cases causes stoppage or reduction of vital services. A systematic approach for the determination of deterioration of sewer systems and an integrated management system are necessary to fully understand the complete status of this underground infrastructure system. This paper discusses the major aspects of integrated management for sewer systems, namely, the development of network identification, sewer classification and sewer condition rating systems, sewer deterioration mechanisms, prediction modeling, and the use of optimization techniques for maximizing benefit/cost ratios over a planning horizon. A case study, based on large combined sewers from the city of Indianapolis, has been used to demonstrate the use of the framework of this integrated life-cycle based sewer management system. Deterministic dynamic programming is employed to identify appropriate sewer rehabilitation techniques at different stages during the planning horizon adopted for the sewer systems.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: modelling, dynamic programming, utilities, optimization technique, case study, sewer, deterioration, underground infrastructure system, management system, liability
Subjects: construction type, data collection methods, material degradation and durability, analytical methods, management, algorithms, infrastructure and transport systems, liability law
Topics: Construction Technology, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here