Data-driven analysis of corporate risk using historical cost-control data

Minato, T and Ashley, D B (1998) Data-driven analysis of corporate risk using historical cost-control data. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(1), pp. 42-47. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The process of risk management includes three phases of risk identification, risk quantification, and risk control. Of the three phases, many managers agree that the major benefits of risk management are derived from the insights through the way project risk is identified. The approach for managing project risks may be broken down into two ways. One way is to analyze risks by those unique characteristics associated with individual projects, and implement project strategies by a single project. Another approach may be to classify risks into similar groups, those that exist simultaneously and routinely in a portfolio of company's projects, and adopt corporate strategies across projects. This paper is concerned with the second approach. This research postulates that there exist some covariable risks, or corporate risk, among a company's project portfolio, and maintains the hypothesis that such risks could be diminished efficiently using strategies made at the higher levels of corporate management rather than strategies at the project level. While most managers may acknowledge this assertion, they often lack a useful tool by which to analyze risk at issue. As a result, the major goal of this paper is to provide managers with a theoretical framework of risk analysis methodology that will support analyzing a project's risks from their company's point of view.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: quantification, corporate strategy, risk management, strategy, risk identification, project strategy, manager, risk analysis, methodology
Subjects: business, risk assessment, practitioner, strategic project management, research methods, management, financial risk, measurement and scaling, environmental hazards
Topics: Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Governance, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here