Graphic-based human-machine interface for construction manipulator control

Moon, S and Bernold, L E (1998) Graphic-based human-machine interface for construction manipulator control. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(4), pp. 305-314. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Large-scale construction manipulators are important to productivity and safety on the construction site. Traditionally, manipulators are controlled by an operator, who pulls and pushes levers, which open and close hydraulic values. Recently, joysticks have begun to be used as a more sophisticated control method. In either case, the manipulator control utilizes the human operator's manual skills and experience because automation of the control is difficult in a unstructured task environment. An alternative to the traditional control methods, a human-machine interface can be used to combine the human operator's intuitive judgment and skills with intelligent machine control. The goal of this research was to understand the characteristics of the human-machine interface during the telerobotic operation of construction manipulators. The paper discusses a comprehensive control framework that describes the types of control systems for an interactive human-machine interface. A general remote control structure was developed to implement the framework to the telerobotic operation of a bridge maintenance crane. Field experiments were conducted to comparatively evaluate the performance of the general remote control structure in varying task complexities. The test results indicate that the human-machine interface can be implemented flexibly to cope with different task requirements on construction sites.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: experiment, hydraulic, judgment, control method, construction site, complexity, remote control, control system, productivity, automation
Subjects: systems engineering, control systems, data collection methods, dispute resolution, fluid mechanics, management, monitoring and control, automation and robotics, work location
Topics: Research Practice, Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Legal Issues, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here