Shen, L and Song, W (1998) Competitive tendering practice in Chinese construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(2), pp. 155-161. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
In line with the economy reform program, competitive tendering methods have been introduced to the Chinese construction industry to supplement and gradually replace the past assignment system for the procurement of construction projects. The major objectives of applying the competitive methods are to improve the effectiveness of construction investment and to develop the Chinese construction market toward the international procurement practice. This paper examines the development of competitive tendering practices in the Chinese construction industry, particularly in the more developed regions. It presents the characteristics of the tendering practice within the special environment where the national economy system is being reformed from a purely planned system to a market-oriented system. Outstanding problems in the development of tendering practices have also been investigated. A constructive survey and an in-depth discussion from Chinese academic institutions and governmental departments are used to support the analysis. The study provides a strong indication of the potential development of a competitive tendering system in China.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | construction industry, effectiveness, construction market, competitive tendering, survey, construction project, national economy, program, China |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, economic analysis, Geography, production management, market analysis, software systems, performance management, data collection methods, tendering |
| Topics: | Procurement, Quality Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Digital Applications, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here