Thomas, S R; Tucker, R L and Kelly, W R (1998) Critical communications variables. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(1), pp. 58-66. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Effective communications are essential to the successful completion of engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) projects. Research from the Construction Industry Institute (CII) confirms this hypothesis. However, this finding would be of little benefit without a means for measuring a project's communications effectiveness. This paper documents the efforts of a CII research team in identifying and measuring critical communications variables during the execution phases of EPC projects. It confirms the common recognition of communication problems, provides insight into communications theory, and outlines procedures used by the research team throughout the study. Critical communications variables identified in the process are consolidated into six manageable categories establishing the basis for a communications improvement program. These categories in relative order of importance are accuracy, procedures, barriers, understanding, timeliness, and completeness. The paper concludes by acknowledging that this is the first step in solving project communications problems. To gain maximum benefit from this research, the categories and variables identified must be incorporated into an assessment tool and applied as part of a communications improvement program.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | project communication, accuracy, documents, program, Construction Industry Institute, effectiveness |
| Subjects: | software systems, performance management, professional development, research organizations |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Quality Management, Information Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here