Time series analysis for construction productivity experiments

Abdelhamid, T S and Everett, J G (1999) Time series analysis for construction productivity experiments. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(2), pp. 87-95. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Time series analysis is a powerful statistical tool that can be of great value in evaluating the results of experiments to improve construction productivity. Time series analysis recognizes the importance of the order in which experimental data are observed, and the statistical dependence of observed data. This paper presents a brief overview of time series analysis and demonstrates its application using previously published data for a series of experiments involving crane lift cycle durations. In one experiment, it was shown that despite no apparent change in productivity, a new technology changed the nature of the work operation. In another experiment, a change in productivity was observed, but little change to the overall operation was seen. In a third experiment, a large change in the complexity of the operation can be seen as well as a clear learning effect. The underlying changes are due to differences in disturbances to the overall operation. These nonproductivity changes may be of great interest to the researcher, but they would not be identified using conventional productivity comparison techniques.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: new technology, time-series analysis, productivity, duration, construction productivity, experiment, complexity
Subjects: operations management, innovation and technology management, systems engineering, management, data collection methods, research evaluation and metrics, project controls
Topics: Project Management, Business Strategy, Time Control, Research Practice, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here