Alhozaimy, A M and Al-Negheimish, A I (1999) Introducing and managing quality scheme for rmc industry in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(4), pp. 249-255. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
There is tremendous growth in the use of ready-mixed concrete (RMC) for construction in developing countries. In Saudi Arabia, the production and use of RMC is now widespread, but the quality of concrete construction is still generally substandard. The RMC industry is not regulated or monitored. This has contributed to a general disregard for the basics of good quality as well as cheating by some RMC producers. To rectify the situation and to improve the performance of RMC producers, systematic external monitoring and inspection is required. Recently, the Municipality of Riyadh has started implementing a mandatory quality scheme for RMC plants operating in the city. The scheme was designed considering the difficulties and constraints common to implementing a quality scheme in developing countries. This paper gives details of the quality scheme as developed for RMC in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Specifically, the scheme's objectives, its elements, as well as the major difficulties and challenges encountered during its development and implementation are highlighted and discussed. This scheme's impact on the performance of RMC producers and the quality of concrete produced during the first two years are presented. The implementation of the scheme has resulted in tangible improvement in all aspects of RMC operation and product quality. Based on the experience and progress achieved so far, it can be concluded that a mandatory quality scheme can be introduced successfully into the existing RMC industry in developing countries with immediate benefits to the industry and its customers.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | monitoring, implementation, Saudi Arabia, inspection, product quality, cheating, concrete construction, municipality, developing country |
| Subjects: | behavioural issues, control systems, contractual arrangements, Geography, development economics, building construction, administrative law, quality assurance |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Ethics, International Construction, Legal Issues, Site Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here