'Just in time' information for performance based systems

Kashiwagi, D T; Slater, C and Kashiwagi, M (2002) 'Just in time' information for performance based systems. In: Greenwood, D (ed.) Proceedings of 18th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2002, Northumbria, UK.

Abstract

One of the major problems in implementing performance contracting is the identification of selection performance criteria and the enormity of the amount of performance information required to guarantee performance. Every construction project has unique requirements. To have an efficient information system, the amount of information required to minimize risk makes a performance contracting process seen uneconomical in terms of cost and time. This research proposes that a “Just-in-time” approach to information that has been very successful in the manufacturing supply chain area can be used in construction performance based contracting. In conjunction with the concepts of information measurement theory (IMT), where the information system minimizes the amount of data, where the data is refined instead of the processor, and where decisions are minimized and used to delegate responsibility, the “just in time” concept would minimize the need for complex modeling, excessive information gathering, and decision making and minimum standards. The research uses the results of over 300 tests of the Performance Information Procurement System (PIPS) to support the theoretical hypothesis of “Just-in-time” Information. The research proposes that the concepts of performance information may be more effective than complex modeling and extensive database systems in minimizing risk and producing performing construction.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: just in time information; best value procurement; construction performance information; information management
Index terms: performance-based, information system, modelling, just-in-time, procurement system, best value procurement, decision-making, construction project, database, construction performance, guarantee, performance criteria
Subjects: performance assessment, contractual arrangements, analytical methods, data management, decision analysis, lean logistics, information systems, contract structure, performance measurement, tendering, production management
Topics: Engineering Principles, Project Management, Risk Management, Procurement, Digital Applications, Supply Chain Management, Quality Management, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here