Kululanga, G K; McCaffer, R; Price, A D F and Edum-Fotwe, F (1999) Learning mechanisms employed by construction contractors. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(4), pp. 215-223. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper introduces concepts of organizational learning and how they relate to construction contractors. It also presents the results of a survey conducted to establish the learning practices of construction contractors that operated in the United Kingdom and focuses on the use of learning mechanisms that help corporate establishments address their need for continuous improvement. The results show a low use of various forms of learning mechanisms and provide a general insight into learning practices of construction contractors surveyed. It also sheds light as to why construction contractors may be described as slow in adapting to their changing business environment. The paper urges construction contractors to move forward into a culture of learning to increase their ability to innovate and ensure continuous improvement demanded in today's dynamic business environment.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | survey, organizational learning, construction contractor, continuous improvement, United Kingdom |
| Subjects: | Geography, data collection methods, practitioner, professional development, performance measurement |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Geographical Context, Information Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here