Ueki, M; Haas, C T and Seo, J (1999) Decision tool for microtunneling method selection. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(2), pp. 123-131. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Microtunneling is a type of trenchless technology for underground pipeline construction. Using the technology, surface disruptions can be minimized. Currently, open-cut trenching is often not allowed in urban areas or environmentally sensitive areas; therefore, demand for microtunneling is increasing. However, the decision to use microtunneling can be hard to make, because many decision makers are still not familiar with the technology. In fact, it can be a risky and costly process, when used improperly. In order to achieve a successful microtunneling project, it is important to select an appropriate method, considering its strengths and limitations. A decision procedure and tool that outputs appropriate underground pipeline installation methods for specific site conditions is presented here. It should be useful for decision makers who are relatively new to microtunneling, and can be used as a check by more experienced planners.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | urban area, planner, microtunneling, pipeline, pipeline construction |
| Subjects: | geotechnical engineering, urban form and morphology, infrastructure and transport systems, profession, civil engineering |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here